Prosecutors aim to restrict Trump’s public statements about the trial
- Manhattan D.A. seeks gag order for Trump ahead of hush-money trial
- Prosecutors cite Trump’s history of inflammatory remarks about legal cases
- Gag order would restrict Trump from making public statements about witnesses and jurors
- Prosecutors want to show jurors the ‘Access Hollywood’ video
- Trump’s lawyers argue against showing the video in court
- Judge has not yet ruled on the requests
- Trial is scheduled to start on March 25
- Prosecutors argue that without limits, Trump’s rhetoric would distract and delay the trial
- Trump’s campaign calls the gag order request ‘election interference’
- Manhattan case centers on allegations of falsifying records to hide hush-money payments
Prosecutors in Donald Trump’s New York hush-money criminal case have requested a gag order on the former president ahead of the trial. They argue that Trump’s history of making inflammatory remarks about legal cases could interfere with the trial. The gag order would prevent Trump from making public statements about potential witnesses and jurors, as well as statements meant to harass the court’s staff and prosecution team. Prosecutors also want to show jurors the ‘Access Hollywood’ video, in which Trump bragged about grabbing women’s genitals without permission. Trump’s lawyers oppose showing the video in court. The judge has not yet ruled on the requests, and the trial is scheduled to start on March 25.
Factuality Level: 2
Factuality Justification: The article provides a detailed account of the prosecutors’ request for a gag order on Donald Trump in his New York hush-money criminal case. However, the article contains biased language, sensationalism, and unnecessary details that are tangential to the main topic. It includes opinions presented as facts, such as calling the case a ‘sham orchestrated by partisan Democrats,’ and includes repetitive information about Trump’s history of making inflammatory remarks. The article lacks objectivity and contains elements of propaganda.
Noise Level: 2
Noise Justification: The article provides a detailed and focused report on the prosecutors’ request for a gag order on Donald Trump in his New York hush-money criminal case. It includes relevant information about the case, the arguments from both sides, and the potential implications of the gag order. The article stays on topic and does not contain irrelevant information or filler content. It supports its claims with examples and quotes from involved parties. Overall, the article is informative and directly addresses the key points of the legal proceedings.
Financial Relevance: No
Financial Markets Impacted: No
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Rating Justification: The news article does not pertain to financial topics and does not describe any extreme events.
Key People: Donald Trump (Former President), Michael Cohen (Former lawyer and fixer), Alvin Bragg (District Attorney), Susan Necheles (Trump’s lawyer), Juan Manuel Merchan (Judge), Steven Cheung (Trump campaign spokesperson)
www.marketwatch.com 
