As inflation eases, can Trump still leverage it for electoral gain?

  • Trump’s claims about inflation and prices are often exaggerated.
  • Inflation rates are improving, with consumer prices rising only 2.9% year-over-year as of July.
  • Lower interest rates are benefiting consumers, with mortgage rates at a 15-month low.
  • Harris is gaining trust from voters on economic issues, despite Biden’s struggles.
  • Trump’s proposed policies may inadvertently raise inflation rather than lower it.

Former President Donald Trump recently expressed frustration over rising grocery prices, claiming bacon costs significantly more than it did in the past. However, his figures are misleading; bacon prices have only increased by 18% since President Biden took office, not the 70% Trump suggested. While Trump aims to keep inflation at the forefront of the election narrative, the reality is that inflation is improving. As of July, consumer prices rose just 2.9% from the previous year, a significant drop from the 9.1% peak in mid-2022. This shift has led markets to believe inflation is no longer a pressing issue. nnDespite ongoing concerns about inflation among voters, recent data shows a decline in inflation rates and a rise in unemployment, which could pose challenges for Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee. However, the easing of inflation has resulted in lower interest rates, with mortgage rates hitting a 15-month low, making home buying more affordable. nnHarris is also benefiting from a perception that she carries less blame for the economy than Biden. Polls indicate that voters trust her more on economic matters than they do Biden, although Trump still holds a slight edge. Harris’s campaign focuses on promises to reduce living costs and tackle corporate price gouging, but experts question the effectiveness of such measures. nnOn the other hand, Trump’s economic proposals, including significant tariffs and tax cuts, could actually exacerbate inflation. Economists warn that his plans to impose tariffs could raise consumer prices by 1.4% to 1.7%. While both candidates face challenges in addressing inflation, the evolving economic landscape may diminish the issue’s electoral weight as the election approaches.·

Factuality Level: 6
Factuality Justification: The article presents a mix of factual information and opinion, particularly regarding inflation and political candidates’ claims. While it accurately reports on inflation statistics and provides context, it also includes subjective interpretations of candidates’ statements and potential impacts of their policies, which may lead to some bias. Additionally, there are instances of exaggeration in the claims made by Trump that are not fully substantiated. Overall, the article is informative but lacks complete objectivity.·
Noise Level: 7
Noise Justification: The article provides a detailed analysis of inflation, political narratives, and the economic implications of candidates’ policies. It critiques Trump’s exaggerations and discusses the potential consequences of his proposed policies, which adds depth. However, it could benefit from more scientific rigor and clearer actionable insights.·
Public Companies: Barclays (BCS), S&P Global (SPGI), Deutsche Bank (DB)
Key People: Donald Trump (Former President), Kamala Harris (Vice President), Jared Bernstein (Chairman of Biden’s Council of Economic Advisers), Jim Burkhard (Head of Oil Research for S&P Global Commodity Insights), JD Vance (Trump’s Running Mate), Amy Walter (Editor of the Cook Political Report)

Track all markets on TradingView

Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: The article discusses inflation rates, interest rates, and potential impacts on consumer prices and the economy, which are crucial for financial markets.
Financial Rating Justification: The article focuses on inflation, grocery prices, and economic policies proposed by political candidates, all of which have significant implications for financial markets and consumer behavior.·
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Extreme Rating Justification: The article discusses inflation and economic issues but does not report on any extreme event that occurred in the last 48 hours.·
Move Size: 18%
Sector: All
Direction: Down
Magnitude: Medium
Affected Instruments: Bonds

Reported publicly: www.wsj.com