Stocks and bonds poised for a more normal pattern of performance

  • Speculation that the 60-40 portfolio may have outlived its usefulness has been rife on Wall Street
  • The case for allocating a healthy portion of one’s portfolio to bonds is compelling
  • Investors who buy more bonds at current levels could reap rewards for years to come
  • Waning inflation helps to normalize the relationship between stocks and bonds
  • Equity valuations are looking stretched, making the case for diversification stronger
  • The 60-40 portfolio has been a staple of financial advisers’ advice since the 1950s
  • Market performance since the financial crisis has slowly undermined the 60-40 portfolio
  • Bonds failed to offset losses in stocks in recent years
  • The relationship between stocks and bonds tends to normalize once inflation slows
  • Investors have an opportunity to lock in attractive returns with bonds at current levels

Speculation has been rife on Wall Street about the usefulness of the 60-40 portfolio, but the case for allocating a healthy portion of one’s portfolio to bonds is compelling. With the yield on the 10-year Treasury note hovering around 4% and the Federal Reserve expected to cut interest rates, investors who buy more bonds at current levels could reap rewards for years to come. Waning inflation is also helping to normalize the relationship between stocks and bonds, making bonds a helpful portfolio hedge during tumultuous times. Additionally, equity valuations are looking stretched, further strengthening the case for diversification. However, market performance since the financial crisis has slowly undermined the 60-40 portfolio, with bonds failing to offset losses in stocks. But analysts predict that once inflation slows, the relationship between stocks and bonds will normalize, providing an opportunity for investors to lock in attractive returns with bonds at current levels.

Public Companies: Vanguard (V), Deutsche Bank (DB), Goldman Sachs Group (GS)
Private Companies: undefined, undefined, undefined
Key People: Michael Lebowitz (Portfolio Manager at RIA Advisors), Aizhan Anarkulova (Academic at Emory University), Rob Haworth (Senior Investment Strategy Director at U.S. Bank’s Wealth-Management Business)


Factuality Level: 7
Justification: The article provides a mix of factual information and opinions from market strategists and portfolio managers. It discusses the performance of the 60-40 portfolio, the relationship between stocks and bonds, and the potential benefits of including bonds in a portfolio. While some statements are based on historical data and projections, others are subjective opinions.

Noise Level: 4
Justification: The article contains some relevant information about the potential benefits of allocating a portion of one’s portfolio to bonds, especially given the current yield on the 10-year Treasury note. However, there is also a lot of repetitive information and speculation without much evidence or data to support the claims. The article also includes some irrelevant information about the history of the 60-40 portfolio and the performance of stocks and bonds in recent years. Overall, the article could have provided a more thoughtful analysis and supported its claims with more evidence.

Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: Bond markets, stock markets

Presence of Extreme Event: No
Nature of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating of the Extreme Event: No
Justification: The article discusses the potential benefits of allocating a healthy portion of one’s portfolio to bonds, citing the current yield on the 10-year Treasury note and the Federal Reserve’s projected interest-rate cuts. It also mentions the case for diversification due to stretched equity valuations. However, there is no mention of any extreme events or their impact.

Reported publicly: www.marketwatch.com