Exploring the possibility of extraterrestrial technology

  • Scientists are using machine learning to search for alien megastructures
  • Data from NASA’s Kepler telescope revealed peculiar dips in light from Boyajian’s Star
  • Citizen scientists played a crucial role in discovering the anomalies
  • Researchers are now using data from NASA’s TESS satellite to search for cosmic outliers
  • Machine learning is being used to analyze the vast amount of data collected
  • Human input is still necessary to identify and understand unusual patterns

Scientists are harnessing the power of machine learning to search for signs of alien megastructures in the universe. The search began in 2015 when anomalies were discovered in the light emitted by Boyajian’s Star, captured by NASA’s Kepler telescope. Citizen scientists played a crucial role in identifying these peculiar dips in light. Now, researchers are using data from NASA’s TESS satellite to search for cosmic outliers. Machine learning algorithms are being employed to analyze the vast amount of data collected, but human input is still necessary to identify and understand unusual patterns. While no definitive evidence of alien megastructures has been found yet, the search continues.

Public Companies: NASA (N/A)
Private Companies: SETI Institute
Key People: Daniel Giles (postdoctoral researcher at the SETI Institute)

Factuality Level: 6
Justification: The article discusses the search for alien megastructures based on the analysis of data from NASA’s Kepler telescope. It presents the initial excitement and subsequent conclusion that the peculiar dips in light observed from Boyajian’s Star were likely caused by dust rather than a massive piece of futuristic alien technology. The article also explains the use of machine learning to search for anomalous signals in data collected by NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite. While the article includes some speculative language and mentions the possibility of finding alien megastructures, it also acknowledges the limitations of current technology and the need for human analysis. Overall, the article provides a balanced and informative discussion of the topic.

Noise Level: 3
Justification: The article starts off with a speculative and sensationalized claim about the possibility of an alien megastructure, which is misleading and not supported by evidence. It then goes on to discuss the research and analysis being done by scientists, which is more relevant and informative. However, the article includes unnecessary tangents about human movement and the limitations of AI and ML, which are unrelated to the main topic and add to the noise level.

Financial Relevance: No
Financial Markets Impacted: No

Presence of Extreme Event: No
Nature of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating of the Extreme Event: No
Justification: The article does not pertain to financial topics and does not describe any extreme events.

Reported publicly: www.space.com