Higher tariffs and a more vulnerable economy make China more susceptible to potential damage from another trade war

  • China’s economy is more vulnerable to higher tariffs due to its reliance on exports
  • Trump proposed raising tariffs on Chinese imports to 60% if he wins the election
  • Chinese exporters found new markets and experienced a surge in exports during the pandemic
  • A Kamala Harris presidency would have a smaller impact on China’s economy compared to Trump’s proposal
  • Tariffs could lead to currency weakening, tax rebates for exporters, and interest rate cuts by China
  • Trump’s tariffs in the first term hurt corporate earnings, business confidence, and investment
  • Other countries are also raising barriers against Chinese imports
  • China may face challenges selling goods to alternative markets due to pushback from other nations
  • Building factories overseas could help defuse tensions but may reduce domestic manufacturing employment

If Donald Trump wins the presidency, China’s economy could face significant challenges due to its reliance on exports. During his first term, he imposed tariffs of up to 25% on $350 billion worth of Chinese imports and China retaliated with tariffs on U.S. goods. If Trump raises these tariffs to 60%, the economic impact would be much more severe. The country’s economy is now more vulnerable, and economists predict a potential drop in growth from 4.8% to 3.4%. Chinese exporters have found new markets during the pandemic, but other countries are also raising barriers against Chinese imports. If Trump wins, China may face challenges selling goods to alternative markets as nations like India, Brazil, and Mexico push back against Chinese imports. Building factories overseas could help defuse tensions but might reduce domestic manufacturing employment.

Factuality Level: 7
Factuality Justification: The article provides accurate and objective information on the potential economic impact of a Trump presidency on U.S.-China trade relations and China’s economy. It cites experts and studies to support its claims and discusses various possible responses from China in case of increased tariffs. However, it could have been more concise and focused on the main topic without including unnecessary details about China’s economic struggles unrelated to Trump’s policies.
Noise Level: 4
Noise Justification: The article provides a balanced analysis of the potential economic impact of a Trump presidency on the U.S.-China trade war and China’s economy, but includes some repetitive information and relies on expert opinions without providing concrete evidence or data to support its claims.
Public Companies: Goldman Sachs (GS), UBS (UBS)
Private Companies: BCA Research,Pictet Asset Management,Seafarer Capital Partners,Oxford Economics
Key People: Donald Trump (Former President of the United States), Xi Jinping (President of China), Matthew Gertken (Chief Geopolitical Strategist at BCA Research), Patrick Zweifel (Chief Economist at Pictet Asset Management), Nick Borst (Director of China Research at Seafarer Capital Partners), Adam Slater (Lead Economist at Oxford Economics)

Track all markets on TradingView

Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: U.S. and Chinese financial markets and companies
Financial Rating Justification: The article discusses the potential impact of increased tariffs on Chinese imports if Donald Trump wins the White House in November, which could have a significant effect on both U.S. and Chinese economies and financial markets. It also mentions that China has found new markets to offset some of the effects of the trade war, but other countries are pushing back against Chinese imports, potentially leading to further tensions.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Extreme Rating Justification: The article discusses potential future economic impacts of proposed tariffs by Donald Trump on China, but does not report on any extreme event that has occurred in the last 48 hours.·
Move Size: No market move size mentioned.
Sector: Technology
Direction: Down
Magnitude: Large
Affected Instruments: Stocks

Reported publicly: www.wsj.com