Protesters from the past reflect on the similarities and differences

  • Protesters on college campuses in the 1960s and ’70s are seeing similarities with today’s unrest
  • Both movements made demands and faced arrests
  • Some of the older protesters support the current demonstrations, while others see differences
  • The current protests have sparked debates over antisemitism and safety on campus
  • Protesters from the ’60s and ’70s see moral outrage in both situations
  • Differences include the level of organization and diversity of today’s protesters
  • Some older protesters disapprove of the violent language used by current demonstrators
  • The dispersal of protesters and police tactics have also changed
  • The older protesters hope the current generation continues to seek peace in the Middle East

Protesters from the 1960s and ’70s who demonstrated against the Vietnam War and for civil rights are drawing parallels between their actions and the current unrest on college campuses. While some of the older protesters support the current demonstrations, others see differences in the level of organization and the violent language used by today’s protesters. The current protests have also sparked debates over antisemitism and safety on campus. Despite the differences, both generations of protesters see moral outrage in their respective causes. The dispersal of protesters and police tactics have also changed over the years. The older protesters hope that the current generation continues to seek peace in the Middle East.

Factuality Level: 3
Factuality Justification: The article provides firsthand accounts and perspectives from individuals who were involved in protests in the 1960s and ’70s and draws parallels to current protests on college campuses. However, the article lacks objectivity and balance as it primarily focuses on the opinions of individuals who participated in the protests, without providing a broader context or diverse range of perspectives. The article also includes some biased language and presents the views of the interviewees as facts without critical analysis or fact-checking.
Noise Level: 3
Noise Justification: The article provides a historical perspective on protests on college campuses in the 1960s and ’70s and draws parallels to current pro-Palestinian protests. It includes interviews with individuals who participated in the antiwar protests, offering their insights and reflections. The article stays on topic and provides relevant information supported by examples and quotes. However, it lacks a deeper analysis of the long-term trends or consequences of the current protests, and some viewpoints are repeated throughout the article.
Financial Relevance: No
Financial Markets Impacted: No
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Rating Justification:
Key People: James S. Kunen (Former student at Columbia University), Neal Hurwitz (Political science teaching assistant at Columbia), Linda Frey (Retired psychiatrist), Steve Lewis (Retired lawyer), Donald Glascoff (Retired Wall Street lawyer), Dean Kahler (Retired county commissioner), Chic Canfora (Journalism professor at Kent State)

Reported publicly: www.wsj.com