Officials claim launderers chose banks with less scrutiny

  • DEA officials claim drug money launderers targeted Citi ATMs due to their favorability
  • Suspects used Citibank for depositing small amounts below the $10,000 reporting threshold
  • Citigroup’s anti-money laundering programs are robust and designed to detect suspicious activity

U.S. federal law enforcement officials have accused two drug traffickers of using Citigroup Inc. ATMs to launder money due to their favorability for such operations. The suspects allegedly made smaller deposits below the $10,000 reporting threshold to avoid detection. A DEA spokesperson did not comment on the matter. Citigroup maintains that its anti-money laundering programs are robust and designed to detect and report suspicious activity to the government.

Factuality Level: 8
Factuality Justification: The article provides accurate information about the case against two drug traffickers who allegedly used Citigroup ATMs for money laundering. It includes quotes from DEA officials and a statement from Citigroup, but does not mention the names of the agents involved in the investigation.
Noise Level: 4
Noise Justification: The article provides some relevant information about the use of Citibank ATMs by drug traffickers for money laundering but lacks in-depth analysis or new insights. It also includes some irrelevant details such as the mention of HSBC’s past fine and a call to provide feedback.
Public Companies: Citigroup Inc. (C), HSBC (HSBA)
Key People: DEA agent (Drug Enforcement Administration official), spokesperson for Citigroup (Citigroup spokesperson), prosecutors (prosecutors)


Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: Citigroup Inc.
Financial Rating Justification: The article discusses the use of Citigroup ATMs for money laundering by drug traffickers and mentions the bank’s anti-money laundering programs, which could potentially impact its reputation and operations. It also refers to a previous case involving HSBC and their fines related to money laundering.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Extreme Rating Justification: There is no extreme event mentioned in the article, and there are no major consequences or impacts discussed.

Reported publicly: www.marketwatch.com