Who’s in, who’s out, and who failed to qualify

  • Four Republicans will be on stage for the fourth presidential debate
  • Candidates needed at least 6% support in two national polls or 6% in one national poll as well as two polls from four of the early-voting states
  • Candidates also needed at least 80,000 unique donors, with at least 200 of those coming from 20 states or territories
  • Donald Trump is skipping his fourth straight debate
  • Asa Hutchinson failed to qualify for subsequent debates
  • Sen. Tim Scott and Gov. Doug Burgum have dropped out of the race

The fourth Republican presidential debate will feature four candidates on stage. To qualify for the debate, candidates needed a certain level of support in national polls and polls from early-voting states. They also needed a minimum number of unique donors and had to sign a pledge to support the party’s nominee. Donald Trump will not be participating in the debate, and Asa Hutchinson failed to qualify. Additionally, Sen. Tim Scott and Gov. Doug Burgum have dropped out of the race.

Public Companies:
Private Companies:
Key People: Ron DeSantis (White House hopeful), Nikki Haley (White House hopeful), Vivek Ramaswamy (Political newcomer and GOP hopeful), Chris Christie (2024 race’s most vocal critic of Trump), Donald Trump (Current GOP front-runner), Asa Hutchinson (Former two-term Arkansas governor), Tim Scott (Senator from South Carolina), Doug Burgum (Governor of North Dakota)

Factuality Level: 7
Justification: The article provides information about the candidates participating in the fourth Republican presidential debate and those who are not participating. It includes details about their standings, campaign efforts, and reasons for not participating. The information seems to be based on factual events and statements made by the candidates.

Noise Level: 3
Justification: The article provides information about the candidates participating in the fourth Republican presidential debate and those who are not participating. However, it lacks depth and analysis, and there is no evidence or data provided to support the claims made about the candidates. The article also includes irrelevant information about candidates who have dropped out or failed to qualify. Overall, the article contains some relevant information but lacks substance and analysis.

Financial Relevance: No
Financial Markets Impacted: No

Presence of Extreme Event: No
Nature of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating of the Extreme Event: No
Justification: This news article does not pertain to financial topics and does not describe any extreme events.

Reported publicly: www.marketwatch.com