Presidential Immunity at Stake in Trump’s Falsified Records Trial
- Judge Juan M. Merchan delays ruling on presidential immunity in Trump’s hush-money case until September 16.
- Trump found guilty of falsifying business records to conceal a payment to Stormy Daniels in 2016.
- Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg argues that the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity doesn’t apply to this case.
The judge in Donald Trump’s hush-money trial has delayed the ruling on presidential immunity until two days before his scheduled sentencing. The decision was initially set for September 6, with sentencing planned for September 18. However, Trump’s lawyers requested that Judge Juan M. Merchan rule first on their renewed request to recuse himself from the case. If he doesn’t recuse himself, the ruling will be made on September 16. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg argues that the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity does not apply to this case as it involves unofficial acts for which Trump is not immune.
Factuality Level: 8
Factuality Justification: The article provides accurate and objective information about the hush-money trial of Donald Trump, including details on the judge’s decision to postpone a key ruling, the background of the case, and arguments from both sides. It also mentions other criminal prosecutions against Trump but does not include any irrelevant or sensationalized content, personal opinions presented as facts, or logical errors.
Noise Level: 6
Noise Justification: The article provides relevant information about the ongoing legal case against Donald Trump but also includes some repetitive elements and focuses on personal attacks against the judge. It could benefit from more in-depth analysis of the legal arguments and potential outcomes.
Private Companies: Trump’s company
Key People: Donald Trump (Republican presidential nominee), Juan M. Merchan (Judge), Todd Blanche (Trump lawyer), Alvin Bragg (Manhattan District Attorney), Michael Cohen (Trump’s former lawyer), Kamala Harris (Vice President)
Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: New York financial markets, specifically related to legal proceedings involving Donald Trump and his businesses
Financial Rating Justification: The article discusses a legal case against Donald Trump that involves financial aspects such as falsifying business records and hush money payments. The outcome of this case could potentially impact the reputation and financial situation of Trump’s businesses, which in turn may affect New York financial markets.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Extreme Rating Justification: There is no extreme event mentioned in this article.
Move Size: No market move size mentioned.
www.marketwatch.com 
