Supporters rally as Assange’s lawyers seek new appeal hearing
- Julian Assange begins final U.K. legal battle to avoid extradition to U.S.
- Assange has been fighting extradition for over a decade
- Supporters hold protest outside High Court in London
- Assange’s lawyers seek new appeal hearing
- European Court of Human Rights could block extradition
- Verdict expected in several weeks
- Assange indicted on espionage and computer misuse charges
- Supporters argue prosecution is politically motivated
- Assange’s health deteriorating in prison
- Assange’s legal troubles began in 2010
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has started his final legal battle in the U.K. to prevent his extradition to the United States. Assange has been fighting extradition for over a decade, spending seven years in self-exile in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London and the last five years in a high-security prison. His lawyers are asking two High Court judges for a new appeal hearing, which could be his last legal option in Britain. Supporters have gathered outside the High Court, demanding Assange’s freedom and expressing concerns that he could be extradited before the European Court of Human Rights can intervene. The judges are expected to take several weeks to deliver their decision. Assange has been indicted on espionage and computer misuse charges related to the publication of classified U.S. documents. Supporters argue that the prosecution is politically motivated and that Assange won’t receive a fair trial in the U.S. His health has deteriorated during his years of confinement, according to his wife. Assange’s legal troubles began in 2010 when he was arrested in London at the request of Sweden. He sought refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy but was eventually evicted and arrested by British police. Sweden dropped the sex crimes investigations in 2019. If convicted, Assange could face up to 175 years in prison.
Factuality Level: 7
Factuality Justification: The article provides a detailed account of Julian Assange’s legal challenges and the background leading up to his extradition case. It includes statements from both supporters and critics, presenting a balanced view of the situation. The information provided seems to be factual and objective, without significant bias or sensationalism.
Noise Level: 3
Noise Justification: The article provides a detailed overview of Julian Assange’s legal challenges and the events surrounding his extradition case. It includes relevant information about the protests, legal proceedings, and background of the case. However, the article contains some repetitive information and unnecessary details that do not add much value to the overall understanding of the situation.
Financial Relevance: No
Financial Markets Impacted: No
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Rating Justification: The article does not pertain to financial topics, and there is no mention of any extreme events.
Private Companies: WikiLeaks
Key People: Julian Assange (founder of WikiLeaks), Stella Assange (wife of Julian Assange), Chelsea Manning (U.S. Army intelligence analyst), Rishi Sunak (Prime Minister), Victoria Sharp (High Court judge), Jeremy Johnson (High Court judge), Anthony Albanese (Prime Minister of Australia)
www.marketwatch.com 
