D.A.’s office claims high court decision has no bearing on the case
- Manhattan prosecutors argue against dismissing Trump’s hush-money conviction
- Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity not applicable to the case
- Trump’s lawyers request permission for a 30-page response to the prosecution filing
Manhattan prosecutors are urging a judge not to dismiss Donald Trump’s historic hush-money conviction, stating that the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on presidential immunity does not apply to the case. The district attorney’s office argues that the high court’s opinion has no bearing on the case as it involves unofficial acts for which the former president is not immune. Trump’s lawyers have requested permission to file a 30-page response to the prosecution filing, claiming it contains several legal and factual misrepresentations.
Factuality Level: 8
Factuality Justification: The article provides a detailed account of the ongoing legal proceedings involving Donald Trump, including the arguments from both prosecutors and Trump’s defense team. It presents factual information regarding the court’s rulings and the context of the case without significant bias or sensationalism. However, some minor opinions and interpretations are present, which slightly detract from its overall objectivity.·
Noise Level: 6
Noise Justification: The article provides a detailed account of the ongoing legal proceedings involving Donald Trump, including arguments from both prosecutors and defense attorneys. However, while it presents relevant information, it lacks deeper analysis of the implications of the case and does not hold powerful individuals accountable in a meaningful way. The article stays on topic and provides factual information, but it could benefit from more critical insights and exploration of broader consequences.·
Private Companies: Trump Organization
Key People: Donald Trump (former president), Alvin Bragg (Manhattan District Attorney), Todd Blanche (Trump lawyer), Juan M. Merchan (trial judge), Michael Cohen (Trump’s former lawyer), Hope Hicks (former White House communications director), Amy Coney Barrett (Supreme Court Justice), Alvin Hellerstein (U.S. District Judge)
Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: Trump’s legal case
Financial Rating Justification: The article discusses Donald Trump’s hush-money conviction and its potential impact on financial markets due to his political influence and the ongoing legal proceedings, which can affect investor sentiment and market volatility.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Extreme Rating Justification: The article discusses a legal case involving Donald Trump and does not mention any extreme events such as natural disasters, crises, or accidents.·
www.marketwatch.com 
