EU Court Rejects Nike’s Attempt to Trademark Play on Words for Tech-Related Products
- Nike loses EU trademark dispute with Puma over ‘footware’
- Court orders Nike to pay legal costs in Puma’s favor
- Possibility of appeal to the European Court of Justice
Nike has faced a setback in its attempt to trademark the term ‘footware’ after the General Court of the European Union dismissed its application and ordered it to pay legal costs to Puma. The company may appeal the decision to the EU’s highest court, the European Court of Justice. Nike sought to use the play on words between ‘foot’ and ‘software’ or ‘hardware’ for tech-related products, but Puma argued that at least some consumers would misread the term as ‘footwear’, making it descriptive information rather than a product name. The decision follows previous legal tussles in the U.S., U.K., and Europe.
Factuality Level: 8
Factuality Justification: The article provides accurate information about Nike’s trademark application for the term ‘footware’, the decision made by the General Court of the European Union, and Puma’s opposition to it. It also mentions Nike’s previous legal victories and defeats in other jurisdictions. The article is mostly factual with no significant issues related to digressions, misleading information, sensationalism, redundancy, or personal perspective presented as a universally accepted truth.
Noise Level: 3
Noise Justification: The article provides relevant information about a legal dispute between Nike and Puma over the trademark of the term ‘footware’. It reports on the decision made by the General Court of the European Union and mentions possible future actions. However, it lacks in-depth analysis or exploration of long-term trends or consequences. The article does not contain scientific rigor or intellectual honesty but stays on topic and provides some evidence through legal cases.
Public Companies: Nike (NKE), Puma (null)
Key People: Enes Morina (Writer)
Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: Nike and Puma are both companies in the sportswear industry, which can impact their stock prices and financial performance.
Financial Rating Justification: The article discusses a legal battle between Nike and Puma over trademark rights for the term ‘footware’, which could affect their branding and marketing strategies. This has financial implications as it may influence their sales and revenue.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: Other
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Extreme Rating Justification: No extreme event is mentioned in the text. The article discusses a legal dispute between Nike and Puma regarding Nike’s trademark application for the term ‘footware’. The impact of this decision is limited to the companies involved and does not have significant consequences beyond their direct business operations.
www.wsj.com 
