A company offers a service to settle childhood disputes, but the outcome may not be what you expect

  • Company offers a service to send aging parents back in time to witness childhood traumas
  • Only 12% of cases result in parents being proven wrong
  • Even if proven right, parents may not appreciate the significance of their transgressions

A company has emerged with a unique solution for adult children of baby boomers who want to prove their childhood traumas to their aging parents. The service involves sending parents back in time using a time machine, allowing them to witness the traumatic events firsthand. However, the results are not guaranteed. The process begins with a consultation, where a therapist helps the child remind their parent of the transgression. If the parent apologizes, the therapist congratulates them. But if the parent denies or downplays the event, they are tasered unconscious and sent back in time. However, only 12% of cases have resulted in parents being proven wrong. In most instances, the events are found to be more complicated than the child remembers. Even if the child’s version of events is accurate, there is no guarantee that the parent will appreciate the significance of their transgression. The service has its caveats, including the fact that refunds are not given if the parent is proven right and the parent may gloat upon returning from the past. Additionally, there is the possibility that the parent will win over the therapist and they will embark on their own time travel adventures. Physicists refer to this phenomenon as the Boomer Father Paradox, suggesting that parents are incapable of growth. Instead of sending parents back in time, the article recommends that children travel back to their parent’s childhood to gain a deeper understanding of their experiences. Ultimately, the article suggests that sending parents back in time may not be the solution to repairing relationships.·

Factuality Level: 1
Factuality Justification: The article is a satirical piece written by Simon Rich, a humorist and author, and is not meant to be taken as factual information. It contains exaggerated and fictional scenarios about a company offering time travel services to resolve childhood traumas with parents. The content is clearly meant for entertainment purposes and does not provide accurate or objective information.·
Noise Level: 2
Noise Justification: The article is filled with irrelevant and exaggerated content about a fictional service that sends parents back in time to witness past events. It contains exaggerated reporting and repetitive information that does not provide any meaningful insights or solutions.·
Private Companies: Simon Rich Productions
Key People: Simon Rich (Creator and Showrunner)

Financial Relevance: No
Financial Markets Impacted: No
Financial Rating Justification: The article is a fictional satire and does not pertain to financial topics or impact financial markets or companies. It discusses a hypothetical time-travel service for resolving family disputes with humorous anecdotes, but has no connection to real-world finance or market events.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Extreme Rating Justification: ·

Reported publicly: www.wsj.com