How the belief in slowing down AI development caused a rift and led to the OpenAI blowup
- Effective altruism has divided employees and executives at AI companies in Silicon Valley
- The blowup at OpenAI showcased the influence of effective altruism
- Sam Altman’s return marked the limits of effective altruism
- A bruising year for the divisive philosophy
The rise of effective altruism has caused a deep divide within the AI industry in Silicon Valley. This social movement, which advocates for slowing down AI development in order to prioritize ethical considerations, has pitted believers against nonbelievers. The recent blowup at OpenAI served as a stark example of the influence of effective altruism, as tensions reached a boiling point. However, the subsequent return of Sam Altman as chief executive highlighted the limits of this philosophy. Altman’s comeback marked a turning point and showcased the challenges and complexities of implementing effective altruism in practice. Overall, it has been a tumultuous year for this divisive philosophy, with its impact reverberating throughout the industry.
Factuality Level: 7
Factuality Justification: The article provides a general overview of the influence of effective altruism on employees and executives at AI companies in Silicon Valley. However, it lacks specific details and evidence to support its claims. The article also includes some biased language, referring to effective altruism as a ‘divisive philosophy’ without providing a balanced perspective. Overall, the article is moderately factual but could benefit from more in-depth reporting and a more neutral tone.
Noise Level: 3
Noise Justification: The article focuses on the division caused by effective altruism in AI companies and the impact it had on OpenAI. It mentions the return of Sam Altman and the challenges faced by the philosophy. However, it lacks evidence, data, or examples to support its claims and does not provide actionable insights or solutions. The article also does not explore the consequences of decisions on those who bear the risks or hold powerful people accountable. Overall, it contains some relevant information but lacks depth and rigor.
Financial Relevance: No
Financial Markets Impacted: No
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Rating Justification: The article does not pertain to financial topics and does not describe any extreme events.
Public Companies: OpenAI (N/A)
Key People: Sam Altman (chief executive)
www.wsj.com 
