New research challenges the belief that diversity leads to higher profits

  • McKinsey’s research on the link between profits and executive diversity is being questioned
  • Academics have failed to replicate McKinsey’s findings
  • McKinsey’s methodology and lack of transparency are being criticized
  • The influence of McKinsey’s research on diversity policies and investment decisions is significant
  • ETFs based on diversity indexes have underperformed
  • Diversity of thought goes beyond skin color and gender
  • Correlation does not imply causation

A groundbreaking study by McKinsey in 2015 claimed to have found a link between profits and executive diversity, leading to widespread belief in the financial benefits of diversity. However, subsequent research has failed to replicate these findings, raising questions about the methodology used by McKinsey. The lack of transparency in McKinsey’s studies, including the undisclosed names of the companies involved, has further fueled skepticism. Despite the lack of evidence, McKinsey continues to promote the corporate benefits of diversity, blurring the line between correlation and causation. The influence of McKinsey’s research on diversity policies and investment decisions has been significant, with major institutions citing it as evidence for their initiatives. However, ETFs based on diversity indexes have underperformed, suggesting that the choice of investment strategy plays a role in the outcomes. It’s important to recognize that diversity goes beyond skin color and gender, and that diversity of thought can be achieved through various means, such as appointing worker representatives to the board. Finally, it’s crucial to remember that correlation does not imply causation, and investors should critically evaluate the studies they rely on.·

Factuality Level: 2
Factuality Justification: The article presents a critical analysis of McKinsey’s research on the link between profits and executive diversity, highlighting flaws in the methodology and questioning the validity of the findings. It provides detailed information on the challenges faced by academics in replicating the study and raises doubts about the correlation between diversity and profitability. The article also discusses the influence of McKinsey’s research on policy decisions and investment strategies, offering a balanced perspective on the topic.·
Noise Level: 3
Noise Justification: The article provides a critical analysis of McKinsey’s research on the link between profits and executive diversity, highlighting the flaws in the methodology and questioning the widely accepted belief. It discusses the influence of McKinsey’s study on policies and investments, presenting contrasting evidence from academics and real-world examples of diversity-focused funds underperforming. The article challenges the popular narrative and emphasizes the importance of distinguishing correlation from causation, urging readers to be cautious of relying solely on studies like McKinsey’s.·
Public Companies: McKinsey (null), BlackRock (null), Nasdaq (null), State Street Global Advisors (null), London Stock Exchange Group (null), MSCI (null)
Key People:

Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: The article discusses the impact of diversity on corporate profitability and its influence on investment decisions and policies. It mentions the use of McKinsey’s research by investors, lobbyists, regulators, and companies in promoting diversity and justifying investments. The article also mentions the influence of McKinsey’s research on BlackRock’s board diversity target, the SEC’s corporate disclosure of diversity metrics, Nasdaq’s rule requiring diversity on boards, and the creation of ETFs that track diversity indices. It highlights the underperformance of these diversity-focused ETFs compared to the broader market. Overall, the article suggests that the belief in a link between diversity and profitability has been questioned and may not be supported by evidence.
Financial Rating Justification: The article discusses the financial impact of diversity on companies, investment decisions, and policies, making it relevant to financial topics.·
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Extreme Rating Justification: ·

Reported publicly: www.wsj.com