Judge throws out case against British spy accused of false claims
- U.K. judge dismisses Trump’s lawsuit over dossier containing ‘shocking and scandalous claims’
- Judge Karen Steyn throws out the case filed by Trump against Orbis Business Intelligence
- Trump sought damages for alleged violation of British data protection laws
- Steele’s dossier contained rumors and uncorroborated allegations about Trump’s personal conduct
- Orbis argues that the report was never meant to be made public and was published without permission
A U.K. judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by former U.S. President Donald Trump against Orbis Business Intelligence, accusing them of making false and damaging claims in a dossier. The judge ruled that there were no compelling reasons for the case to proceed to trial. The dossier, created by former British spy Christopher Steele, contained rumors and uncorroborated allegations about Trump’s personal conduct. Trump sought damages for alleged violation of British data protection laws. Orbis argued that the report was never meant to be made public and was published without permission. The judge stated that Trump had waited too long to file the claim and that it was bound to fail.
Public Companies:
Private Companies: undefined, undefined
Key People: Donald Trump (former U.S. President), Karen Steyn (Judge), Christopher Steele (founder of Orbis Business Intelligence), Hugh Tomlinson (Trump’s lawyer)
Factuality Level: 7
Justification: The article provides a summary of a judge’s ruling on a lawsuit filed by Donald Trump against Orbis Business Intelligence. It includes statements from both sides and mentions the allegations made in the dossier created by Christopher Steele. However, the article does not provide any additional evidence or analysis to support or refute the claims made by either party.
Noise Level: 3
Justification: The article provides a brief summary of a judge in London throwing out a lawsuit by Donald Trump against a former British spy. It includes some background information on the dossier and allegations made against Trump. However, the article lacks depth and analysis, and there is no evidence or data provided to support the claims made. It also does not provide any actionable insights or solutions. Overall, the article contains some relevant information but lacks substance and intellectual rigor.
Financial Relevance: No
Financial Markets Impacted: No
Presence of Extreme Event: No
Nature of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating of the Extreme Event: No
Justification: The news article does not pertain to financial topics and does not describe any extreme event. It is a legal case involving former President Donald Trump and a British spy, with the judge dismissing the lawsuit.
www.marketwatch.com 
