Investors urged to seek better returns as legal scrutiny intensifies.
- Wealth management firms have been criticized for low interest rates on uninvested cash.
- Recent lawsuits allege breach of fiduciary duty against major firms like Wells Fargo and Morgan Stanley.
- The SEC is investigating cash sweep practices at several wealth management companies.
- Investors are encouraged to explore higher-yield options like money-market funds and high-yield savings accounts.
- Cash sweep practices have generated significant profits for firms, but are now under scrutiny.
In a recent move, Wells Fargo’s wealth management unit has increased the interest rate on some clients’ uninvested cash to better match the rates offered by money-market funds. This change has raised eyebrows among investors who wonder why it took so long. Major firms like Wells Fargo, Charles Schwab, Morgan Stanley, and LPL Financial have been placing clients’ uninvested cash into sweep accounts that yield minimal interest, especially when short-term rates are nearing 5%. This practice, while profitable for the firms, has come under fire as legal and regulatory scrutiny intensifies. Investors have filed lawsuits claiming these companies have breached their fiduciary duties, seeking class-action status and monetary damages. The outcome of these lawsuits will depend on the specifics of account agreements and applicable regulations. With around a dozen lawsuits against seven firms, the pressure is mounting. The SEC is also investigating cash sweep practices at several of these companies. Recently, both Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo have raised the rates they pay on client cash, but many banks have either denied the allegations or chosen not to comment. Investors are advised not to wait for court resolutions to ensure their idle cash is working for them. There are more lucrative options available, such as money-market funds and high-yield savings accounts. Many brokerage firms have historically offered low rates on client cash, but this issue gained attention when the Federal Reserve began raising rates in 2022. Currently, money-market funds and high-yield savings accounts are offering around 5%, significantly higher than the rates typically found in brokerage sweep accounts, which often pay 1% or less. For instance, Charles Schwab reported that nearly half of its $18.8 billion revenue in 2023 came from net interest income, primarily from uninvested client cash. However, as interest rates rose, many investors began moving their cash into higher-yielding accounts, a trend known as cash-sorting, which has negatively impacted earnings for firms like Schwab. Although cash-sorting has slowed this year, wealth management stocks have struggled due to ongoing lawsuits, prompting some firms to raise rates on client cash. Wells Fargo has indicated that its increase in cash sweep interest could reduce net interest income by approximately $350 million this year. Similarly, UBS expects that raising sweep deposit rates could lower pretax profits by around $50 million annually. The type of account clients hold also plays a crucial role in the interest rates they receive. Advisory and brokerage accounts are subject to different regulatory standards, which can affect how firms manage client cash. The SEC is currently investigating Wells Fargo’s cash sweep options for advisory clients, while Morgan Stanley has also been responding to SEC inquiries regarding its sweep cash practices. Both firms have raised rates for advisory accounts but not for brokerage accounts. For example, Morgan Stanley now offers a yield of 2% for clients with $250,000 or more in its advisory accounts, up from 0.01%. In contrast, brokerage accounts still earn only 0.01% on deposits up to $500,000. Wells Fargo has also increased rates on cash in advisory accounts to align more closely with money-market fund rates. Investor lawsuits claim that wealth management companies have failed to provide higher-paying default options, violating their obligations to clients. One notable case involves the estate of a deceased Morgan Stanley client, alleging that the company did not pay a higher rate in its default bank sweep program. Morgan Stanley has responded by seeking to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing it was filed too late and that the cash sweep does not constitute an investment recommendation. Other lawsuits target the substantial profits generated by cash sweep practices. For instance, a Wells Fargo client has accused the firm of breaching fiduciary duty due to the minimal returns on cash deposits. Similarly, investors are suing LPL Financial over its cash sweep practices, claiming they are designed to benefit the firm at the expense of clients. Wells Fargo and Morgan Stanley have declined to comment on ongoing cases, while Schwab disputes allegations from three investors, emphasizing that it offers high-yield options for long-term cash. As these legal battles unfold, investors should keep a close eye on the interest rates they earn on their cash balances. While some may need to maintain cash for bills or investment opportunities, it’s advisable not to keep excess funds in low-paying sweep accounts. Instead, consider switching to higher-yield options like money-market funds, high-yield savings accounts, or short-term Treasuries. Although rates may decline as the Federal Reserve cuts rates, they will likely remain above the low sweep rates for the foreseeable future. Investors may also want to consider switching to brokerage firms that offer higher-yielding money-market funds as default options. For example, Interactive Brokers’ Pro platform offers up to 4.83% on cash balances over $10,000, while Fidelity’s Government Money Market Fund has a yield of 4.94%. Vanguard clients can access a 5.21% yield through the Vanguard Federal Money Market Fund. It’s essential for cost-conscious investors to pay attention to expense ratios, as even small differences can accumulate over time. As the Fed continues to adjust rates, the yield gaps between different investment accounts may narrow, but they are unlikely to close entirely. Ultimately, investors should be proactive in understanding where their cash is held and how much interest it earns.·
Factuality Level: 8
Factuality Justification: The article provides a detailed overview of the current situation regarding cash sweep accounts and interest rates at wealth management firms. It includes relevant data, legal context, and insights into investor behavior. However, it could be seen as slightly biased towards the perspective of investors seeking higher returns, and some sections may contain unnecessary detail that could distract from the main points.·
Noise Level: 8
Noise Justification: The article provides a detailed analysis of the current state of cash sweep practices in wealth management, highlighting legal challenges, regulatory scrutiny, and the implications for investors. It offers actionable insights for readers on better alternatives for managing uninvested cash, supported by data and examples. The content is relevant and focused, holding financial institutions accountable for their practices.·
Public Companies: Wells Fargo (WFC), Charles Schwab (SCHW), Morgan Stanley (MS), Goldman Sachs (GS), UBS (UBS), Interactive Brokers (IBKR), Fidelity Investments (N/A), Vanguard (N/A)
Private Companies: LPL Financial
Key People: Alexander Blostein (Analyst at Goldman Sachs), Bernard J. Sherlip (Deceased Morgan Stanley client), Keith Bujold (Wells Fargo client), Daniel Peters (Investor suing LPL Financial)
Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: The article discusses the impact of interest rates on wealth management firms and their cash sweep practices, which affects their profitability and stock prices.
Financial Rating Justification: The article focuses on the financial practices of major wealth management firms and the implications of legal scrutiny and interest rate changes on their operations and investor returns.·
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Extreme Rating Justification: The article discusses ongoing lawsuits and regulatory scrutiny in the wealth management industry but does not report on any extreme event that occurred in the last 48 hours.·
Move Size: No market move size mentioned.
Sector: All
Direction: Down
Magnitude: Large
Affected Instruments: Stocks
www.barrons.com 
