Aligning with Money-Market Fund Rates, Lawsuits Follow
- Wells Fargo raises interest rates on uninvested cash for some wealth management clients
- Alignment with money-market fund rates
- Potential reduction in net interest income by $350 million this year
- Industry-wide issue of low rates paid on uninvested cash
- Lawsuits filed against Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, and Charles Schwab over cash sweep practices
Wells Fargo has increased interest rates paid on some wealth management clients’ uninvested cash to align with prevailing money-market fund rates. This move comes after the company disclosed that the Securities and Exchange Commission was investigating its practices related to cash sweep options for investment advisory clients. The change may reduce net interest income by approximately $350 million this year. Wells Fargo’s decision to adjust rates is targeted at advisory accounts, according to CFO Michael Santomassimo. Money-market funds typically pay more than 5% currently. However, the company has not explained why only advisory accounts were affected and not brokerage accounts. A spokesperson declined to provide further details. Wells Fargo’s bank sweep deposit program pays as little as 0.05% on cash deposits up to $1 million, with higher rates for larger deposits and non-taxable accounts. The industry faces scrutiny over low rates paid on uninvested client cash, with some investors filing lawsuits against Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, Charles Schwab, and others, accusing them of not acting in clients’ best interests and seeking class action status and monetary damages.
Factuality Level: 8
Factuality Justification: The article provides accurate information about Wells Fargo raising interest rates on wealth management customers’ uninvested cash and the ongoing investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. It also mentions the potential impact on net interest income and the industry-wide issue of low rates paid on clients’ uninvested cash. The article does not include any irrelevant or misleading information, sensationalism, redundancy, opinion masquerading as fact, bias, invalid arguments, logical errors, inconsistencies, or fallacies.
Noise Level: 3
Noise Justification: The article provides relevant information about Wells Fargo’s decision to raise interest rates on wealth management customers’ uninvested cash and the ongoing investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. It also mentions the industry-wide issue of low rates paid on wealth management clients’ uninvested cash and recent lawsuits against other companies for their cash sweep practices. The article stays on topic and supports its claims with evidence, but it could provide more details about the impact on customers and potential consequences.
Public Companies: Wells Fargo (WFC), Morgan Stanley (MS), Charles Schwab (SCHW)
Key People: Michael Santomassimo (CFO)
Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: Wells Fargo’s wealth management customers, other wealth management companies like Morgan Stanley and Charles Schwab
Financial Rating Justification: The article discusses Wells Fargo raising interest rates on uninvested cash in its wealth management customers’ accounts, which impacts their financial situation directly. It also mentions lawsuits against Wells Fargo and other wealth management firms over cash sweep practices, potentially affecting the industry as a whole.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Extreme Rating Justification: There is no extreme event in the text, as it discusses Wells Fargo’s decision to raise interest rates on wealth management customers’ uninvested cash and related lawsuits against the company.
Move Size: No market move size mentioned.
Sector: Finance
Direction: Neutral
Magnitude: Small
Affected Instruments: Stocks
www.barrons.com 
